Wednesday, June 4, 2008

American Censorship

Recently Yazmany Arboleda attempted to showcase a pair of art exhibitions in Manhattan titled, “The Assassination of Hillary Clinton” and “The Assassination of Barack Obama.” The police in that area almost immediately closed the exhibition on the basis of censorship. The Secret Service were also present and held Mr. Arboleda for questioning most of the day and did not allow him to answer questions from reporters for some time.

This is American Censorship at its worst. This is completely going against the freedom of speech which is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. After viewing the content personally on the artist’s websites, it is quite obvious that the police closed the exhibition on the basis of the title alone and not the content of the galleries. Mr. Arboleda stated that the art was supposed to portray character assassination by the media and the word ‘assassination’ should not be taken literally. The content for both exhibitions, Obama and Clinton, could be described as provocative and perhaps a bit lewd. But in my opinion the two worst offenses were a description as Hillary Clinton as, "The Antidote to Niggeritis” and a sprawling picture of a gargantuan black penis at the Obama gallery intended to reference some of the common stereotypes associated with black males. All things considered, this is not terribly shocking material. It is not uncommon, and is a form of art.

Mr. Arboleda may have been toeing the line on what is considered acceptable among the American public by using a few edgy words and showing a giant penis. But can you not go to your neighborhood video store and rent videos that are much more graphic and use coarser language than what was presented by Mr. Arboleda? These videos are not censored and are readily available for purchase. So why would Mr. Arboleda’s art exhibit be censored and closed when it is only showing what is already available for people see everyday if they so choose? This is just another ridiculous example of the American government trying to tell its citizens how to live their lives. It should not have been censored and the government needs to focus on more important things.

2 comments:

Lilly Buchwitz said...

Fascinating! Great topic.

Faye said...

It's been a while since you posted this - I'm surprised more people didn't pick up the chance of conversation... The so-called Patriot Act was passed years ago. They're checking each of our civil rights off, from a list. Censorship started with the FCC. The supreme court just ruled that our 4th amendment rights are null and void, and they've already done away with habeus corpus. Our country has been run on debt since 1913, and if that doesn't disturb you, you really should watch Zeitgeist.

I am glad that this got you riled up. We as Americans have a civil obligation to speak out for our own rights. Our leaders can not be trusted. Our forefathers (some of them, at least) tried to tell us that. The ones who didn't were bankers.

Feel free to continue discussing, although I'll probably be more likely to check my own blog for new comments.